Lcp060587’s Weblog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Revkin Response October 21, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 10:01 pm

     The Revkin article discussed how in many cases published research findings get blown out of proportion, taken out of context, or distorted. This can create panic when it is unnecessary and can also be misleading. Reporters can also be responsible for reporting on scientific findings in a misleading manner, creating a confused public. Also many studies have shown that people are now finding sources of information to reinforce their already existing views, instead of allowing new research findings with the most factual evidence create a view.

            This article made me realize that many of the news stories and articles that are so highly publicized could be some what misleading. These news stories may only discuss one side of the story or may take information out of context in order to make a better story. These issues do require the public to do a little research for themselves and try to get the truth of the matter. After reading this article I will definitely be some what skeptical of news breaking scientific research findings, political news, and economic news. All of the findings in these fields change so much over time that there is constantly something new evolving and being studied.  

 

Scholarly vs. Popular Articles October 20, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 1:11 pm

     When compared to popular articles, scholarly articles are usually much longer, typically peer reviewed, and they are typically written using a higher level vocabulary than a popular article. Scholarly articles also have fewer pictures where as popular magazines are trying to keep the readers attention so they have lots of pictures. The authors of scholarly articles are experts in the article topic were as popular article authors are typically journalist who have chosen to write about the topic.

 

Annotated Bibliography Part B October 10, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 10:41 am

- To narrow my search topic I first thought of topics that were relevant to my everyday life and some what interesting to me that would also fall under the topics you asked us to choose from. Then during part A of the Annotated Bibliography assignment I thought of several different research ideas that would fall under the broad category of privacy in the digital age. After brainstorming several different topics I searched the UNCW card catalog system for materials related to each of the research questions I brainstormed. After browsing the card catalog I narrowed my research topic down to the threat of the Internet on peoples personal privacy because I was able to find relevant sources of information related this topic and I also find it interesting.

- Research Question: How has the Internet compromised users privacy?

- To find books related to my research topic I used the UNCW Randall Library website to search the online card catalog. I used the advanced search option with a keyword search within UNCW’s collection of books.  I searched for books containing the keywords (Internet) and (privacy) first to find books relevant to my topic. I also did a keyword search of the card catalog system using security and Internet, Internet user* and privacy, and world wide web and privacy as keyword combinations. With each of these searches I reviewed the books that contained the keywords I was looking for and wrote down their call numbers. Using the books call numbers I found the books in the UNCW library.

-Books

- 1)Citation -

Brin, David. The Transparent Society. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley, 1998.

Author and Audience- The author of this book, David Brin wears many hats. He is a well known global author as well as a reputable researcher, a scientist, a speaker, a futurist, and a technical consultant. David also frequently appears on TV to share his views, ideas, and research, such as the history channel. This book won David  the Freedom of Speech Prize from the American Library Association and he has also won multiple Hugo and Nubela awards. I feel that his awards and qualifications make this a reliable source of information. This book is written for the educated general public. While anyone could read this book the reader would have to have some basic knowledge of the technology that Brin is discussing in the text in order to understand it. His writing is easy to understand if the reader has some understanding of the topics discussed.

Summary- With this book David Brin touches on many topics associated with the advancements of technology. He discusses some of the major innovations in the past and how they have impacted society. One of the main topics discussed in this book is the effects of new technologies on privacy. Brin gives several examples of technologies and how they have compromised peoples privacy. He continues on to predict what he feels technology will become in the future and what the effects of it will be. Brin also discusses various ways that the governments around the world have used technological advancements for their benefit at the expense of everyone elses’ privacy. This book focuses on the ramifications technology is having and will have in the future on privacy.

Critical Comment- My initial reaction to this book after skimming through parts of it is that much of it seems very opinion based, even though he has backed it up with factual data and information. It almost seems as though he formed his opinions on the topic and then found relevant facts and figures to back up his opinions. This book does not offer a very neutral view of the issues dealing with technology and privacy. While I feel that Brin makes several good points about the negative effects that technology has has on privacy he fails to mention any of the positive effects of technology on privacy. In many cases discussing the pros and cons of a situation can make a view point much stronger.

-Relevance-This book brings up many relevant arguments on the topic of technology and privacy. Brin brings up many past technologies that compromised privacy even before the Internet that I had not previously though of. This made me question exactly when peoples’ privacy began being compromised. The ideas brought up in this book really made me think about what effects future technologies could possibly have on society. Just to see how things have advanced in the short time that I have been using various technologies is mind boggling and made me wonder what all is to come.

- 2) – Citation -

Goldsmith, Jack, and Tim Wu. Who controls the Internet? New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Author and Audience – Jack Goldsmith is a Harvard Law professor who has written many works discussing law and the Internet. He as several published books as well as many periodical articles. Seeing as he is a law professor at Harvard university I feel that he is a reputable source for information. Ti Wu, the other author, is a professor at Columbia Law school where he teaches subjects related to communications. Currently Wu is continuing his research focusing on the Internet and communications technologies. I also feel that Tim Wu is a reputable author and a good source of information due to his strong educational background. I feel that the intended audience for this text is the general public. The authors did a very good job of introducing the topic with sufficient background information and using language that anyone could understand. The writing is very easy to follow and understand, making it an easy read for almost anyone.

Summary – This book focuses on how the invention of the Internet has created an virtual global community with no boundaries. This book begins with the invention of the Internet in the early 1990’s and how it changed the world. It then goes into the controversies that arose once people started using the Internet as it became a popular tool. The issues arose of who was in charge of the Internet? Should governments have the authority to control the Internet? Should each government control it individually or would it be a collective effort since the Internet is a global tool. This book goes into the legal side of the Internet and its revolution from the 1990’s to now, discussing several legal issues related to privacy.

Critical Comment- After skimming sections of this book my gut feeling is that this is a very reputable well written source of information. I feel that the authors have approached this subject in a very neutral and informative manner. I feel that this book is very factual and contains valid information seeing as there are many situations and references through out the book to back up their information. 

Relevance - I found this work to be very informative and to contain a lot of relevant information. It made me think of things that had never crossed my mind before. One of the main topics that made me think was the idea of who actually controls the Internet? This book brings up many interesting topics related to the Internet. I found this source of information to be very relevant to my research since it focuses on legal aspects of the Internet, many of which deal with privacy issues.

 

Class Review October 1, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 9:33 pm

     The class that I have enjoyed the most up to this point occurred on September 24th. In this class we discussed book censorship and had a debate on how book censorship should occur, and the Tango book. I felt that the discussion helped all students get involved in the class and think about the topic at hand. Having the discussion also help me see other sidesof the issue that I would have never thought of. The discussion and debate were fun ways to learn about issues within libraries.

     One complaint I have thus far about the class is the amount of small on going assignments that we have going on all at once. Don’t get me wrong, I do not mind having a lot of grades to make up my final grade but at times it is kind of hard to keep up with whats due and when, with all of the various things we have going on at one time. I think that one think that makes it difficult/confusing for me is that we are using three different systems to get information from for the class (blackboard, the library page, wordpress). At times I just feel as though we have to many little things going on at once.

 

Stebbins Response September 27, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 10:12 pm

Before reading the Stebbins exert I was unaware that a person paraphrasing and citing a source could still be caught for plagiarizing if their paraphrase is to close to the authors original words. I originally thought that as long as information was cited a person could not be accused of plagiarizing. This exert helped to refresh my memory about the rules of paraphrasing and how to avoid getting into trouble for plagiarizing. I also found it very ironic that one of the examples of public figures getting busted for plagiarizing is now a vice presidential candidate for the up coming elections.

 

Part A Annotated Bibliography September 23, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 8:58 pm

Topic – Privacy in the digital age – related to social networking sites (ie Myspace and Facebook).

Why – I chose this topic because I feel that it is very relevant to today’s society, as social networking sites are becoming more and more popular. There are an increased number of social networking sites, as well as an increase in the use of these sights.

Narrow Topic -An area a little more specific on this topic I would be interested in would be ways to maintain privacy while using social networking sights, and what rights of privacy a patron of the sights is entitled to.

Research Questions- What are some ways to protect privacy on social networking sites?

What can a user of these sights do to protect their personal privacy?

Which sites are known for there high privacy standards?

What are some of the standard privacy features that these sites provide?

Are there any privacy regulations or laws inforced apon social networking sites?

 

9/22 definitions September 23, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 8:46 pm

Wikis- Software that freely allows users to post,share, and edit web page information from any server at location around the world.

inter-library loan- When a library patron can borrow a book or other source of information from another library around the world. The item can be mailed from the library where it is held at to the library of the patron that needs it.

Worldcat- A library database which provides access to library catalogs around the world. This allows people to find books or other sources of information in libraries around the world.

Microforms- A way of preserving old documents by minimizing them and placing them on film, they then can be stored more easily and viewed with special machines. These films allow for the preservation and distribution of old documents that may other wise be destroyed.

Annotation- A way of organizing and ranking by importance various sources of information. Annotations will include a citation, a short summary or overview of the source, the relevance of the source, and the writers credentials.

Citation-A reference to a source of information. This allows for the information to be verified or found again if need be.

 

Read Response September 17, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 1:03 am

Before reading the Wikipedia article I had no idea that so many scholarly people were against the website. I had previously thought they were only against it because of how easily information could be added and deleted to the existing information, which increased the chances of false date being shared, but it seems that they now have bigger issues with Wikipedia. I was really impressed with how quickly false information can be found and corrected by the people verifying the posted information on Wikipedia. Having a system in place that flags changes to articles and insures that the information is correct makes Wikipedia a much more credible resource. Even though the information was corrected in a matter of hours there still could have been viewers that read the false information. In order to improve this downfall of Wikipedia, I feel like Wikipedia should add some type of disclaimer to articles that have been changed by the public, but have yet to be verified by the Wikipedia staff since it may take a little time for them to verify every updated article. This would just make the reader feel more confident in the end that information they are getting from Wikipedia is correct/true information and that it has been verified. I feel that Wikipedia will continue to grow, improve, and gain more credibility in the future.

 

9/15 Definitions September 16, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 11:27 pm

Scope: The extent or range of information on a topic

Authority: An accepted source of information (dictionary.com).

3 Types of reference materials:

1. Almanac – an annual reference book of useful and interesting facts relating to countries of the world, sports, entertainment, etc (dictionary.com).

2. Dictionary – A source containing definitions or meanings and uses of different words in a given language

3. Map - A drawing or representation of a certain area or giving space of land.

 

9/11 definitions September 16, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindsey @ 11:18 pm

Boolean Operators: Words used to conduct complex, more accurate searches in databases, includes and, or, not.

Truncation: Putting an asterisk at the end of the root of a word in a database search so that the search will pick up on all of the different versions of that word that may be used.

Concept Map: A way of brainstorming related words or topics to an original concept.

Searching: To look for a specific information, or an object, topic, or item.

Browsing: To glance at or skim through randomly